Hughes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hughes v. State

1930 OK CR 399, 291 P. 1118, 48 Okla. Crim. 305, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 146

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 13, 1930

DocketNo. A-7620.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 399 (Hughes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes v. State, 1930 OK CR 399, 291 P. 1118, 48 Okla. Crim. 305, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 146 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Roger Mills county on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The case was tried in July, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in October, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

We have examined the record, and the evidence is sufficient from which the jury might reasonably and logically find the defendant guilty.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Roger Mills county on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The case was tried in July, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in October, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

We have examined the record, and the evidence is sufficient from which the jury might reasonably and logically find the defendant guilty.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 399, 291 P. 1118, 48 Okla. Crim. 305, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.