Hughes v. State

136 S.W.3d 161, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 819, 2004 WL 1245445
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hughes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1653
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 8, 2004·No. No. WD 62940·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Roderick A. Hughes appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following evidentiary hearing. He contends that the motion court clearly erred by failing to find that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel that rendered his plea involuntary, in that counsel failed to apprise him prior to the plea that the information had been amended to charge him as a prior and persistent offender under § 195.291, RSMo Supp. 1998.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hughes v. State, 136 S.W.3d 161, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 819, 2004 WL 1245445 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

136 S.W.3d 161 (Hughes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.