Hughes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hughes v. State

778 S.W.2d 689, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 1989 WL 91334

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 15, 1989

DocketNo. 55975

StatusPublished

This text of 778 S.W.2d 689 (Hughes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes v. State, 778 S.W.2d 689, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 1989 WL 91334 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

778 S.W.2d 689, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 1989 WL 91334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-state-moctapp-1989.