Hughes v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Hughes v. State

782 S.W.2d 585, 301 Ark. 241, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 35

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJanuary 29, 1990

DocketRC 90-3

StatusPublished

This text of 782 S.W.2d 585 (Hughes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes v. State, 782 S.W.2d 585, 301 Ark. 241, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 35 (Ark. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Benny Hughes, by his attorneys, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorneys, Dale Grady and William F. Magee, have by affidavit admitted it was their fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorneys, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Benny Hughes, by his attorneys, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorneys, Dale Grady and William F. Magee, have by affidavit admitted it was their fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorneys, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

782 S.W.2d 585, 301 Ark. 241, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-state-ark-1990.