Hughes v. Scaffidi
This text of Hughes v. Scaffidi (Hughes v. Scaffidi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
DANNY HUGHES,
Appellant-Defendant, Case No. 23-cv-0937-bhl v.
JOHN M SCAFFINDI,
Appellee-Plaintiff
PATRICK LAYNG
Appellee ______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________
On July 13, 2023, appellant Danny Hughes, proceeding without counsel, filed a notice of bankruptcy appeal and a motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) The Court has authority to allow a bankruptcy appellant to proceed without prepaying the filing fee if the Court determines that the individual “has income less than 150 percent of the income official poverty line (as defined by the Office of Management and Budget…) applicable to a family of the size involved and is unable to pay that fee in installments.” 28 U.S.C. § 1930(f)(1). Even if an appellant meets the income requirement and shows an inability to pay in installments, “the decision to waive the fee is discretionary,” and the Court must still decide whether it is appropriate to waive the fee in a specific case. See Matter of Ali, Case No. 18-25548- gmh, 2018 WL 3323875, at *1 (E.D. Wis. Bankr. July 5, 2018) (citation omitted); § 1930(f)(1) (“[T]he district court…may waive the filing fee….”) (emphasis added). As for his indigency, Hughes’s motion indicates that he and his spouse are both unemployed. (ECF No. 1 at 3; ECF No. 2 at 1.) Hughes has a thirteen-year-old stepson who is his dependent. (Id.) He further states that he receives approximately $2,100 in monthly income from Social Security, and has $183 total in cash, checking, or savings accounts. (ECF No. 2 at 2– 3.) Hughes also has monthly expenses: mortgage payments ($980), credit card payments ($295), and other household expenses ($645). (Id.) He states that he owns two vehicles, a 1999 Chevy pickup worth approximately $1,500, a 2007 Jeep Command worth approximately $4,000, in addition to an approximate home equity of $92,000. (Id.) Currently, 150% of the poverty level is an income of $2,465 per month for a family of two. See www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/poverty-guidelines.pdf. Hughes’s monthly income of $2,100 puts him below that amount, satisfying the first requirement for a fee waiver under Section 1930(f)(1). However, given the information Hughes provided in his motion, it is unclear whether he would be able to make installment payments. His motion will therefore be denied without prejudice. Because the decision to waive the fee is discretionary, the Court will also review his notice of appeal for sufficiency. Hughes’s notice states that the subject of his appeal is Case Number 15- 23793, adversary numbers 15-2388 and 15-2399, and that judgment was entered November 24, 2015. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) He cryptically writes “new evidence” and “appeal-decision of adversary hear” next to the provided case numbers. (Id.) The docket from the bankruptcy court notes that Adversary Proceeding Number 15-02388-beh was terminated January 12, 2016, and the last docket entry before Hughes’s 2023 notice of appeal occurred on May 23, 2017, when Plaintiff John M. Scaffidi paid the adversary filing fee. (ECF No. 1-1 at 1, 8.) Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8002 governs the time for filing a notice of appeal. Under Rule 8002(a)(1), a notice of appeal must be filed within fourteen days after the entry of judgment, order, or decree being appealed. But if a party files a motion to amend or make additional findings under Rule 7052, to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 9023, for a new trial under Rule 9023, or for relief under Rule 9024, the time to file an appeal runs from the entry of the order disposing of the last such remaining motion. Rule 8002(b)(1). Additionally, a court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal by an additional 21 days if the party shows excusable neglect. Rule 8002(d). A “failure to file a timely notice of appeal divests the district court of its jurisdiction over the appeal and mandates the dismissal of the appeal.” In re Schwinn Bicycle Co., 209 B.R. 887, 890 (N.D. Ill. 1997). And “[i]t is within a district court’s sound discretion to dismiss an appeal from a bankruptcy court order when the appellant negligently fails to comply with procedural rules.” In re ANR-Advance Transp. Co., Inc., 73 F. App’x 183, 185 (7th Cir. 2003). Hughes’s notice of appeal comes more than seven years after both the date his case was dismissed and the date he claims judgment was entered. (See ECF No. 1 at 1; ECF No. 1-1 at 1.) He provides no other information that would remedy his years-long delay in filing this appeal. “The fact that the appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal is reason enough for the court to dismiss the appeal.” Redzinski v. Whitten, Case No. 18-cv-1853-pp, 2020 WL 533767, at *2 (E.D. Wis. Feb. 3, 2020). The Court will therefore deny Hughes’s appeal and dismiss his case. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Hughes’s motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, ECF No. 2, is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant’s bankruptcy appeal, ECF No. 1, is denied and this case is dismissed. The Court affirms the decision of the bankruptcy court. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin on July 20, 2023. s/ Brett H. Ludwig BRETT H. LUDWIG United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hughes v. Scaffidi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-scaffidi-wied-2023.