Hughes v. RIVERA-ORTIZ
666 S.E.2d 751, 362 N.C. 501, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 805
Opinion
As to the issue on direct appeal based on the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hughes v. RIVERA-ORTIZ, 666 S.E.2d 751, 362 N.C. 501, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 805 (N.C. 2008).
666 S.E.2d 751 (Hughes v. RIVERA-ORTIZ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vigus v. Milton A. Latta & Sons Dairy Farms, Inc.
676 S.E.2d 669 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)