Hughes v. Raymond

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hughes v. Raymond

916 So. 2d 985, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20269, 2005 WL 3533657

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 28, 2005

DocketNo. 4D05-4486

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 916 So. 2d 985 (Hughes v. Raymond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes v. Raymond, 916 So. 2d 985, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20269, 2005 WL 3533657 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition of Chad Michael Hughes for a writ of habeas corpus for [986]*986reduction of pre-trial bond, and remand this case to the trial court to determine a reasonable bond after consideration of Hughes’ financial resources, and any other pertinent factors. See Miller v. Jenne, 780 So.2d 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Henley v. Jenne, 796 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). We find this case distinguishable from Henley where the trial court found that based on Henley’s prior offenses and the nature of the current charges, he posed a significant risk of danger to the community. No such findings were made in this case when the trial court set the bond at hand.

We grant the writ and remand for further proceedings.

FARMER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition of Chad Michael Hughes for a writ of habeas corpus for [986]*986reduction of pre-trial bond, and remand this case to the trial court to determine a reasonable bond after consideration of Hughes’ financial resources, and any other pertinent factors. See Miller v. Jenne, 780 So.2d 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Henley v. Jenne, 796 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). We find this case distinguishable from Henley where the trial court found that based on Henley’s prior offenses and the nature of the current charges, he posed a significant risk of danger to the community. No such findings were made in this case when the trial court set the bond at hand.

We grant the writ and remand for further proceedings.

FARMER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

916 So. 2d 985, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20269, 2005 WL 3533657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-raymond-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack