Hughes v. Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas

51 A.3d 180, 616 Pa. 543, 2012 WL 3195809, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1745
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 8, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.3d 180 (Hughes v. Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hughes v. Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, 51 A.3d 180, 616 Pa. 543, 2012 WL 3195809, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1745 (Pa. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.3d 180, 616 Pa. 543, 2012 WL 3195809, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-philadelphia-court-of-common-pleas-pa-2012.