Hughes v. New York State Police & Firemen's Retirement Systems

245 A.D.2d 946, 666 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13597
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 24, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 946 (Hughes v. New York State Police & Firemen's Retirement Systems) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hughes v. New York State Police & Firemen's Retirement Systems, 245 A.D.2d 946, 666 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner’s application for ordinary disability retirement benefits.

Substantial evidence supports the determination which disapproved the application of petitioner, a former police officer, for ordinary retirement disability benefits because he was not permanently incapacitated from performing his duties. Although the record contains a 1980 medical report which concluded that petitioner suffered from a personality disorder which rendered him mentally impaired to perform the duties of a police officer, petitioner failed to proffer any medical evidence attesting to this disability contemporaneous with his [947]*9471991 application for retirement benefits. Nevertheless, the record contains the 1993 medical report of the psychiatrist who examined petitioner on behalf of the State Retirement System and who was unable to establish a diagnosis and concluded that petitioner was not permanently physically or mentally incapacitated for the performance of his duties as a police officer. Under the circumstances, we find that substantial evidence supports the finding that petitioner failed to sustain his burden of establishing his entitlement to ordinary disability retirement benefits and, accordingly, confirm the denial of his application (see, Matter of Delson v Regan, 190 AD2d 984, 985).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Ruggiero v. New York State Comptroller
2018 NY Slip Op 1695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D.2d 946, 666 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-new-york-state-police-firemens-retirement-systems-nyappdiv-1997.