Hughes v. Murdock

13 So. 182, 45 La. Ann. 935
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1893
DocketNo. 11,243
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 13 So. 182 (Hughes v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hughes v. Murdock, 13 So. 182, 45 La. Ann. 935 (La. 1893).

Opinion

[Reported by syllabus only.]

When, by subsequent order of court, imperfections in a transcript are cured, a pending motion to dismiss will be overruled as matter of course.

A plaintiff who attacks an act not per se wrongful, but which may be perfectly ' consistent with good faith and fair dealing, must aver and specify the facts giving to it a different character.

Up to judgment the pleadings are taken most strongly against the pleader, and unknown, unreeited facts are not assumed in his favor.

The Legislature of a State, unlike Congress, which can not do anything which the Federal Constitution does not authorize, may do everything which the State Constitution does not prohibit, and constitutional prohibitions are not enlarged by construction beyond their terms.

Article 113 of the Constitution of 1868 prohibiting the adoption of children by special legislative act does not prohibit legitimation by such an act; the two subjects are separate and distinct.

No one can be said to have any vested right in any existing legal capacity in reference to any future contract or advantage to result from that capacity. He who to-day is by law a forced heir in expectancy may to-morrow by a new law be declared liable to be disinherited by will or incapable even of succeeding áb intestato. It may be assumed as a general rule that the mere capacity or incapacity of particular classes of persons to contract or to inherit depends-upon the legislative will.

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

The opinion of the court was delivered by Watkins, J.

On the Merits.

The opinion of the court was delivered by Nicholls, O. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Guidry
173 So. 2d 192 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1965)
W. R. Aldrich & Co. v. Gravity Drainage District Number 1
114 So. 2d 860 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1959)
Housing Authority v. Pittman Construction Co.
264 F.2d 695 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)
Succession of GAMBINO
73 So. 2d 800 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1954)
Ricks v. Department of State Civil Service
8 So. 2d 49 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1942)
Sun Oil Co. v. Blevins
29 F. Supp. 901 (W.D. Louisiana, 1939)
State Ex Rel. Muslow v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp.
176 So. 686 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)
State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Grosjean
161 So. 871 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1935)
State Ex Rel. George M. Jensen Printing Co. v. Snively
221 N.W. 535 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1928)
Norum v. Queen City Oil Co.
264 P. 122 (Montana Supreme Court, 1928)
Minor v. Young
87 So. 472 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1920)
Toone v. State
59 So. 665 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1912)
State v. Hackley, Hume & Joyce
50 So. 772 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1909)
Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Anderson
41 So. 263 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1906)
Bacas v. Adler
36 So. 739 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)
State v. Board of Public Works
31 A. 613 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 So. 182, 45 La. Ann. 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-murdock-la-1893.