Hughes v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Hughes v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

178 N.W. 607, 146 Minn. 475, 1920 Minn. LEXIS 655

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 9, 1920

DocketNo. 21,719

StatusPublished

This text of 178 N.W. 607 (Hughes v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co., 178 N.W. 607, 146 Minn. 475, 1920 Minn. LEXIS 655 (Mich. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Peb Curiam.

This action was brought ¡by plaintiff in his own behalf to recover damages on account of the injury to his son Theodore R. Hughes' which was the subject of the action of James M. Hughes as father of Theodore R. Hughes against this same defendant. (Plaintiff had a verdict and the court gave judgment notwithstanding the verdict. 'From the decision in that case supra, page 268, 178 N. W. 665, it follows that the judgment in this case must be reversed. No motion for a new trial was made. Leave should now be given to defendant to move for a new trial, if it desires to do so.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peb Curiam.

This action was brought ¡by plaintiff in his own behalf to recover damages on account of the injury to his son Theodore R. Hughes' which was the subject of the action of James M. Hughes as father of Theodore R. Hughes against this same defendant. (Plaintiff had a verdict and the court gave judgment notwithstanding the verdict. 'From the decision in that case supra, page 268, 178 N. W. 665, it follows that the judgment in this case must be reversed. No motion for a new trial was made. Leave should now be given to defendant to move for a new trial, if it desires to do so.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 N.W. 607, 146 Minn. 475, 1920 Minn. LEXIS 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-minneapolis-street-railway-co-minn-1920.