Hughes v. Martin
35 Misc. 832, 72 N.Y.S. 1108
This text of 35 Misc. 832 (Hughes v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hughes v. Martin, 35 Misc. 832, 72 N.Y.S. 1108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).
Opinion
The indisputable evidence showed that defendant, under an assumed name, employed the plaintiff as a broker in realty to perform services for him. Those services were rendered, and the defendant failed to. pay the regular commission. We think the judgment awarded for such commission is correct.
Present: Scott, P. T., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 Misc. 832, 72 N.Y.S. 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-martin-nyappterm-1901.