Hughes v. Krumm

6 N.E.3d 1202, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1464
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 23, 2014
Docket2014-0075
StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.E.3d 1202 (Hughes v. Krumm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hughes v. Krumm, 6 N.E.3d 1202, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1464 (Ohio 2014).

Opinion

Miscellaneous case. On motion to dismiss of Steve Krumm. Motion granted. On consideration of relator’s motions to treat all documents as notarized, to provide immediate remedy or, in the alternative, motion to immediately personally appear to seek remedy, and motion to provide immediate remedy. Motions denied. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.E.3d 1202, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-krumm-ohio-2014.