Hughes v. Kiddell
2 S.C.L. 324
This text of 2 S.C.L. 324 (Hughes v. Kiddell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hughes v. Kiddell, 2 S.C.L. 324 (S.C. Ct. App. 1801).
Opinion
after hearing the arguments, refused to grant a new trial, on the ground that an endorsement for part of a note or bill is bad. Lex Mercatoria, 445. Carth. 466. And if so, then two vitious endorsements can never constitute a good one.
Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 S.C.L. 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-kiddell-scctapp-1801.