Hughes v. Johnstown & Croton Telephone Co.

88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 598
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 17, 1913
DocketNo. 13286
StatusPublished

This text of 88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 598 (Hughes v. Johnstown & Croton Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hughes v. Johnstown & Croton Telephone Co., 88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 598 (Ohio 1913).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed.

Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 Ohio St. (N.S.) 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-johnstown-croton-telephone-co-ohio-1913.