Hughes v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hughes v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.

55 S.E. 229, 126 Ga. 462, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 412

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 13, 1906

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 S.E. 229 (Hughes v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co., 55 S.E. 229, 126 Ga. 462, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 412 (Ga. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

The evidence in this ease did not sustain the allegations of the declaration and amended declaration, and the plaintiff was not entitled to have the case submitted to the jury. The proper judgment, however, should have been one of nonsuit, rather than a dismissal on the pleadings and evidence. The judgment is affirmed, with direction that it be so altered as to be one of nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed, with direction.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin, J.

The evidence in this ease did not sustain the allegations of the declaration and amended declaration, and the plaintiff was not entitled to have the case submitted to the jury. The proper judgment, however, should have been one of nonsuit, rather than a dismissal on the pleadings and evidence. The judgment is affirmed, with direction that it be so altered as to be one of nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed, with direction.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 S.E. 229, 126 Ga. 462, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-georgia-railway-electric-co-ga-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack