Hughes v. Director, TDCJ-CID

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

BRANDON DONYA HUGHES, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) V. ) ) DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, ) ) Respondent. ) Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-2741-C-BN

ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising that the Court should deny Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus and request for an evidentiary hearing. | The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or

contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989), After due consideration and having conducted a de novo review, the Court finds that Petitioner’s objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is

therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are ADOPTED as

| Petitioner, who is represented by counsel, filed objections to the United States Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation on April 21, 2021.

the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus and request for an evidentiary hearing be DENIED. □□ SO ORDERED this Z day of May, 2021.

= At) Aad ROOF ey i { é wffy C46 / \ Ss R.€ INGS ZA ~-SENIOR ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE