Hughes v. Cummings

7 Colo. 203
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedDecember 15, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 7 Colo. 203 (Hughes v. Cummings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hughes v. Cummings, 7 Colo. 203 (Colo. 1883).

Opinion

On petition for rehearing the following opinion was delivered by

Helm, J.

We have carefully examined the exhaustive argument of counsel upon this application; but neither the reasons assigned, nor the authorities cited, warrant us in changing our views.

An effort was made to impeach the correctness of the record of a court of general jurisdiction in a collateral proceeding. This court has held that unless the defect complained of appears on the face of the record itself, the judgment of such a court is exempt from attack, save in a direct proceeding. The adoption of any other rule would render all judgments insecure, and result in the most disastrous consequences.

The district court had no jurisdiction to try the issue nTade by the replication; therefore no error was committed in sustaining defendant’s demurrer thereto.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kavanagh v. Hamilton
53 Colo. 157 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1912)
Trowbridge v. Allen
48 Colo. 419 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1910)
Peninsular Savings Bank v. Ward
76 N.W. 161 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)
Youngstown Bridge Co. v. Kentucky & I. Bridge Co.
64 F. 441 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana, 1894)
Rawles v. People ex rel. Cornforth
2 Colo. App. 501 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Colo. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-cummings-colo-1883.