Hughes v. . Crooker

56 S.E. 510, 144 N.C. 764
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 19, 1907·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Court below, has found as a fact that the defendant is a non-resident of -North Carolina, and we find there is sufficient evidence to support such finding. The motion to dissolve the attachment was properly denied.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hughes v. . Crooker, 56 S.E. 510, 144 N.C. 764 (N.C. 1907).

56 S.E. 510 (Hughes v. . Crooker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.