Hughes v. Caruthers

26 La. Ann. 530
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1874
DocketNo. 5191
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 26 La. Ann. 530 (Hughes v. Caruthers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hughes v. Caruthers, 26 La. Ann. 530 (La. 1874).

Opinion

On Motion to Dismiss.

Ludeling, C. J.

A motion to dismiss this appeal has been made on the ground that the amount of the bond is insufficient. The bond is for the amount fixed by the judge. It is therefore sufficient to maintain the appeal.

The motion is refused.

On the Merits.

The only question involved in this case is the right of the lessor to seize movables belonging to a third person, which have been removed from the leased premises within fifteen days before the seizure. He can not. C. C., art. 2709. It is the property of the lessee alone which can be seized under such circumstances.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the lower court against the third opponent be annulled, and that there be judgment in favor of the third opponent, setting aside the provisional seizure of her property for costs in both courts.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Suite 5-A/B Partnership v. DJF Co.
417 So. 2d 865 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1982)
Kupperman v. Moore
171 So. 104 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1936)
Blanks v. Lephiew
61 So. 615 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)
Fitzpatrick v. Letten
49 So. 494 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 La. Ann. 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-v-caruthers-la-1874.