Hughes v. Calabrese
746 N.E.2d 193, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1500, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1148
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hughes v. Calabrese. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 Ohio St. 3d 1486 →
Opinion
In Prohibition. On April 23, 2001, relator filed a motion to strike respondent’s memorandum in opposition to relator’s motion for reconsideration. It appears to the court that relator’s motion to strike is, in substance, a reply to respondent’s memorandum in opposition. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(4)(B) prohibits a reply to a memorandum opposing a motion,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that relator’s motion to strike be, and hereby is, stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hughes v. Calabrese, 746 N.E.2d 193, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1500, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1148 (Ohio 2001).
746 N.E.2d 193 (Hughes v. Calabrese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.