Hughes Tool Co. v. Conaghan

W.D. Oklahoma

Hughes Tool Co. v. Conaghan

113 F. Supp. 527, 98 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 137, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2612

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 1, 1953

DocketCiv. A. No. 4374

StatusPublished

This text of 113 F. Supp. 527 (Hughes Tool Co. v. Conaghan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes Tool Co. v. Conaghan, 113 F. Supp. 527, 98 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 137, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2612 (W.D. Okla. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

VAUGHT, Chief Judge.

The above entitled cause and Hughes Tool Company v. Cole, 113 F.Supp. 519, were consolidated for trial and the same evidence which was the basis for the opinion in the Cole case will be treated as the 'basis for the opinion in the instant case. Therefore, the opinion rendered in the Cole ■case is adopted and made the opinion in this ■case.

A proper form of judgment may be submitted within thirty days from this date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAUGHT, Chief Judge.

The above entitled cause and Hughes Tool Company v. Cole, 113 F.Supp. 519, were consolidated for trial and the same evidence which was the basis for the opinion in the Cole case will be treated as the 'basis for the opinion in the instant case. Therefore, the opinion rendered in the Cole ■case is adopted and made the opinion in this ■case.

A proper form of judgment may be submitted within thirty days from this date.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 F. Supp. 527, 98 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 137, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-tool-co-v-conaghan-okwd-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack