Hughes Beverage Co. v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Hughes Beverage Co. v. Hughes

861 So. 2d 1087, 2003 Ala. LEXIS 115, 2003 WL 1900721

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 18, 2003

Docket1010926

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 861 So. 2d 1087 (Hughes Beverage Co. v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes Beverage Co. v. Hughes, 861 So. 2d 1087, 2003 Ala. LEXIS 115, 2003 WL 1900721 (Ala. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

The plaintiff in this declaratory-judgment action, Hughes Beverage Company, Inc., petitioned, pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., for permission to appeal from [1088]*1088the denial of its motion for a summary judgment. This Court exercised its discretion and granted Hughes Beverage Company permission to appeal. However, after thoroughly reviewing the record and the arguments presented by the parties, we conclude that the permission to appeal under Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., was improvidently granted, and we dismiss the appeal. State v. Bassett, 364 So.2d 1175 (Ala.1978).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, Justice.

The plaintiff in this declaratory-judgment action, Hughes Beverage Company, Inc., petitioned, pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., for permission to appeal from [1088]*1088the denial of its motion for a summary judgment. This Court exercised its discretion and granted Hughes Beverage Company permission to appeal. However, after thoroughly reviewing the record and the arguments presented by the parties, we conclude that the permission to appeal under Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., was improvidently granted, and we dismiss the appeal. State v. Bassett, 364 So.2d 1175 (Ala.1978).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

861 So. 2d 1087, 2003 Ala. LEXIS 115, 2003 WL 1900721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-beverage-co-v-hughes-ala-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack