Hughes Alonzo Robinson, Sr. v. Tommy C. Mann, Trustee in Bankruptcy

Fifth Circuit

Hughes Alonzo Robinson, Sr. v. Tommy C. Mann, Trustee in Bankruptcy

352 F.2d 305

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 30, 1965

Docket22639

StatusPublished

This text of 352 F.2d 305 (Hughes Alonzo Robinson, Sr. v. Tommy C. Mann, Trustee in Bankruptcy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hughes Alonzo Robinson, Sr. v. Tommy C. Mann, Trustee in Bankruptcy, 352 F.2d 305 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the last appearance of this case we affirmed an order setting aside a conveyance of real property as having been made in contravention of § 67, sub. d (2) of the Bankruptcy Act. 11 U.S.C.A. § 107, sub. d(2). See Robinson v. Mann, 5 Cir., 1965, 339 F.2d 547. Intent to defraud creditors was not there involved.

The case is now here on appeal from an order finding that the same conveyance was made with intent to defraud creditors with the result that appellant’s discharge in bankruptcy was denied under § 14, sub. c(4) of the Act. 11 U.S. C.A. § 32, sub. c(4).

This finding of the referee, which was affirmed by the District Court, is not clearly erroneous. No error appearing and appellant having had his day in court, it follows that the judgment must be and it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the last appearance of this case we affirmed an order setting aside a conveyance of real property as having been made in contravention of § 67, sub. d (2) of the Bankruptcy Act. 11 U.S.C.A. § 107, sub. d(2). See Robinson v. Mann, 5 Cir., 1965, 339 F.2d 547. Intent to defraud creditors was not there involved.

The case is now here on appeal from an order finding that the same conveyance was made with intent to defraud creditors with the result that appellant’s discharge in bankruptcy was denied under § 14, sub. c(4) of the Act. 11 U.S. C.A. § 32, sub. c(4).

This finding of the referee, which was affirmed by the District Court, is not clearly erroneous. No error appearing and appellant having had his day in court, it follows that the judgment must be and it is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

352 F.2d 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hughes-alonzo-robinson-sr-v-tommy-c-mann-trustee-in-bankruptcy-ca5-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack