Hugh Dorsey Crosby, Samuel Eugene Crosby, and Raymond Arnold Crawford v. United States
This text of 249 F.2d 655 (Hugh Dorsey Crosby, Samuel Eugene Crosby, and Raymond Arnold Crawford v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal in a criminal case for failure of appellants to comply with Rule 12 of this Court, 28 U.S.C.A., in that they have filed no brief as required by the rule. The appeal has nevertheless been docketed, counsel have been heard and the record has been examined by the Court. We find the appeal to be altogether lacking in merit, as defendants were given a fair trial and counsel have been unable to point to any error which could possibly warrant reversal.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 F.2d 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hugh-dorsey-crosby-samuel-eugene-crosby-and-raymond-arnold-crawford-v-ca4-1957.