Huggins v. State
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
CODY HUGGINS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-5608 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )
Opinion filed May 12, 2017.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Michael E. Raiden Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm Cody Huggins' judgments and sentences
and the revocation of his probation. However, the order of revocation of probation
entered on December 4, 2015, does not identify the conditions found to have been
violated. We remand solely for entry of a corrected revocation order specifying the
1Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). condition(s) of probation that Mr. Huggins violated. See Greene v. State, 919 So. 2d
684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("A proper order of revocation will identify the specific
conditions of probation violated by the defendant.").
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huggins v. State (Huggins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.