Huggins v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Huggins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6780
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 2017·No. 2D15-5608·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

CODY HUGGINS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-5608 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed May 12, 2017.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Michael E. Raiden Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm Cody Huggins' judgments and sentences

and the revocation of his probation. However, the order of revocation of probation

entered on December 4, 2015, does not identify the conditions found to have been

violated. We remand solely for entry of a corrected revocation order specifying the

1Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). condition(s) of probation that Mr. Huggins violated. See Greene v. State, 919 So. 2d

684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("A proper order of revocation will identify the specific

conditions of probation violated by the defendant.").

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huggins v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Huggins v. State (Huggins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Greene v. State
919 So. 2d 684 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)