Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Huggins v. State

Huggins v. State

661 So. 2d 1311, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 1995 WL 638322
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Huggins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3861 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1995·No. No. 95-1801·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the order denying the appellant’s 3.850 motion, except that we find that the three-year minimum-mandatory sentences as to Counts II and III are to be served concurrent to each other and consecutive to Count I, and do hereby modify said sentences in this regard. In all other respects the order under review is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huggins v. State, 661 So. 2d 1311, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11430, 1995 WL 638322 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

661 So. 2d 1311 (Huggins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.