Huggins v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Huggins v. State

877 S.W.2d 935, 317 Ark. 428, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 394

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJune 27, 1994

DocketCR 94-564

StatusPublished

This text of 877 S.W.2d 935 (Huggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huggins v. State, 877 S.W.2d 935, 317 Ark. 428, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 394 (Ark. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant has filed a motion for a rule

on the clerk. His attorney, Addie M. Burks, has admitted that the notice of appeal was filed prematurely on February 15, 1994, while his motion for a new trial was still pending. Since his attorney has admitted his responsibility, that is good cause in a criminal case to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant has filed a motion for a rule

on the clerk. His attorney, Addie M. Burks, has admitted that the notice of appeal was filed prematurely on February 15, 1994, while his motion for a new trial was still pending. Since his attorney has admitted his responsibility, that is good cause in a criminal case to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

877 S.W.2d 935, 317 Ark. 428, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huggins-v-state-ark-1994.