Huggins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

269 S.E.2d 471, 154 Ga. App. 559, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2284
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Huggins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 151 Ga. App. 377
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 16, 1980·No. 57998·Published

Opinion

Shulman, Judge.

This court having entered on September 18,1979, a judgment in the above-styled case, 151 Ga. App. 377 (259 SE2d 742), affirming the judgment of the trial court; and the judgment of this court having been reversed on certiorari by the Supreme Court in Huggins v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., 245 Ga. 248 (264 SE2d 191) (1980), the judgment heretofore rendered by this court is vacated.

Our review of the record reveals that a question of fact exists concerning the issue of the employer’s reliance on safety inspections conducted by appellees. Since the Supreme Court has ruled that reliance by the employer, as opposed to the employee, is sufficient, the grant of summary judgment to appellees cannot stand.

Judgment reversed.

Deen, C. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huggins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 269 S.E.2d 471, 154 Ga. App. 559, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2284 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).

269 S.E.2d 471 (Huggins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huggins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
264 S.E.2d 191 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Huggins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
259 S.E.2d 742 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)