Huggins
This text of 196 Ct. Cl. 779 (Huggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Military pay; court-martial jurisdiction. — This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment, having been submitted to the court without oral argument. Plaintiff, a soldier, was convicted by a court-martial of an offense committed during a tour of duty in Germany with dishonorable discharge and forfeiture of pay and allowances. Plaintiff invokes O'Callahan v. Parker, 895 U.S. 258 (1969), but the court finds that the facts differ in no significant way from those before the court in Gallagher v. United States, 191 Ct. Cl. 546, 423 F. 2d 1371 (1970), cert. den. 400 U.S. 849. On the basis thereof, the court, by order dated December 3, 1971, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, granted defendant’s cross-motion, and dismissed the petition. Plaintiff’s motion for rehearing was denied February 18, 1972.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 Ct. Cl. 779, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 39, 1971 WL 4163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huggins-cc-1971.