Hugelmaier v. Town of Sweden

New York Court of Appeals

Hugelmaier v. Town of Sweden

472 N.E.2d 1040, 63 N.Y.2d 909, 483 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4707

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 23, 1984·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order entered on appeal No. 1 affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (101 AD2d 995; cf. Igbara Realty Corp. v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 63 NY2d 201). Appeal from order entered on appeal No. 2 dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order entered on appeal No. 1 affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (101 AD2d 995; cf. Igbara Realty Corp. v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 63 NY2d 201). Appeal from order entered on appeal No. 2 dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Hugelmaier v. Town of Sweden, 472 N.E.2d 1040, 63 N.Y.2d 909, 483 N.Y.S.2d 213, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4707 (N.Y. 1984).

Pincite

472 N.E.2d 1040 (Hugelmaier v. Town of Sweden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related