Hugelier v. Moore

728 So. 2d 821, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3310, 1999 WL 147746
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 19, 1999
DocketNo. 97-1454
StatusPublished

This text of 728 So. 2d 821 (Hugelier v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hugelier v. Moore, 728 So. 2d 821, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3310, 1999 WL 147746 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat the request for review as a petition for a writ of certiorari, Sheley v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla. 1998), and deny the petition. See Meola v. Department of Corrections, 24 Fla. L. Weekly S27, - So.2d -, 1998 WL 904304 (Fla. December 24, 1998)(with regard to petitioner’s issues one and three); State v. Lancaster, 24 Fla. L. Weekly S30, — So.2d -, 1998 WL 82627 (Fla. December 24, 1998)(affirming Orosz v. Singletary, 693 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1997)).

MINER, LAWRENCE and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meola v. Department of Corrections
732 So. 2d 1029 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Orosz v. Singletary
693 So. 2d 538 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'n
720 So. 2d 216 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
728 So. 2d 821, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3310, 1999 WL 147746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hugelier-v-moore-fladistctapp-1999.