Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hufstetler v. Parker

Hufstetler v. Parker

95 S.E. 325, 22 Ga. App. 25, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 114
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 13, 1918
Docket9238
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 325 (Hufstetler v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hufstetler v. Parker, 95 S.E. 325, 22 Ga. App. 25, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 114 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

This case is here upon the overruling of a motion for a new trial, based upon general grounds'only. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment- affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and, Jenkins, J., concur. Appeal; from Murray' superior court—Judge Tarver. September 8, 1917. II. II. Anderson, for plaintiff in error. King & Starr, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 325, 22 Ga. App. 25, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hufstetler-v-parker-gactapp-1918.