Huffmaster v. Jones Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Huffmaster v. Jones Bros.

100 S.E. 227, 24 Ga. App. 198, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 497

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 20, 1919

Docket10116

StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 227 (Huffmaster v. Jones Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huffmaster v. Jones Bros., 100 S.E. 227, 24 Ga. App. 198, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 497 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

The trial judge having by consent of counsel passed upon exceptions of fact and of law to an auditor’s report, and the evidence being sufficient to support his findings upon the facts, and no error of law appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

It appearing, however, that the award of $1,138.49 to Jones Brothers should be debited with $407.80 (already paid to them by the sheriff), which the trial judge inadvertently failed to deduct, it is directed (counsel for defendants in error having already consented to the modification) that the sum of $407.80 be written off the amount of the award to Jones Brothers, and that the judgment bo modified accordingly.

Judgment affirmed, with direction.

Broyles, P. J,, and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

The trial judge having by consent of counsel passed upon exceptions of fact and of law to an auditor’s report, and the evidence being sufficient to support his findings upon the facts, and no error of law appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

It appearing, however, that the award of $1,138.49 to Jones Brothers should be debited with $407.80 (already paid to them by the sheriff), which the trial judge inadvertently failed to deduct, it is directed (counsel for defendants in error having already consented to the modification) that the sum of $407.80 be written off the amount of the award to Jones Brothers, and that the judgment bo modified accordingly.

Judgment affirmed, with direction.

Broyles, P. J,, and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.E. 227, 24 Ga. App. 198, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffmaster-v-jones-bros-gactapp-1919.