Huffman v. Thompson

41 S.W. 428, 64 Ark. 196, 1897 Ark. LEXIS 40
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJune 19, 1897
StatusPublished

This text of 41 S.W. 428 (Huffman v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huffman v. Thompson, 41 S.W. 428, 64 Ark. 196, 1897 Ark. LEXIS 40 (Ark. 1897).

Opinion

Bunn, C. J.

The court erred in holding the language of the affidavit to the schedule insufficient in that it failed to state that the debt sued for was by contract. We think it could mean nothing else. For this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings to ascertain from the facts whether or not the defendant is entitled to bis exemptions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.W. 428, 64 Ark. 196, 1897 Ark. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffman-v-thompson-ark-1897.