Huffman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Huffman v. State

1925 OK CR 43, 232 P. 856, 29 Okla. Crim. 111, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 34

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 31, 1925

DocketNo. A-4770.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 43 (Huffman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huffman v. State, 1925 OK CR 43, 232 P. 856, 29 Okla. Crim. 111, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 34 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, Otto Huffman, was convicted on a charge that he did have in his possession intoxicating liquor with the unlawful intent to sell the same; the jury leaving his punishment to be fixed by the court. April 18, 1923, he was by the court sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and serve six months in the county jail. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on July 17, 1923, a petition in error, with case-made.

No brief has been filed, and no appearance made when -the case was called for final submission. From an ex- *112 animation of the record we have failed to find anything whereof the plaintiff has just right to complain.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, Otto Huffman, was convicted on a charge that he did have in his possession intoxicating liquor with the unlawful intent to sell the same; the jury leaving his punishment to be fixed by the court. April 18, 1923, he was by the court sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and serve six months in the county jail. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on July 17, 1923, a petition in error, with case-made.

No brief has been filed, and no appearance made when -the case was called for final submission. From an ex- *112 animation of the record we have failed to find anything whereof the plaintiff has just right to complain.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and EDWARDS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 43, 232 P. 856, 29 Okla. Crim. 111, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.