Huffman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Huffman v. State

350 So. 2d 5, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3958

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 10, 1977

DocketNo. 49731

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 350 So. 2d 5 (Huffman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huffman v. State, 350 So. 2d 5, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3958 (Fla. 1977).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND and KARL, JJ., concur. BOYD, and SUNDBERG, JJ., dissent with opinions. HATCHETT, J., dissents and concurs with BOYD, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND and KARL, JJ., concur. BOYD, and SUNDBERG, JJ., dissent with opinions. HATCHETT, J., dissents and concurs with BOYD, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 So. 2d 5, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffman-v-state-fla-1977.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack