Huffman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Huffman v. State

350 So. 2d 5, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3958

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 10, 1977·No. No. 49731·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND and KARL, JJ., concur. BOYD, and SUNDBERG, JJ., dissent with opinions. HATCHETT, J., dissents and concurs with BOYD, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND and KARL, JJ., concur. BOYD, and SUNDBERG, JJ., dissent with opinions. HATCHETT, J., dissents and concurs with BOYD, J.

Huffman v. State, 350 So. 2d 5, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3958 (Fla. 1977).

Pincite

350 So. 2d 5 (Huffman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related