Huffman v. Singletary
672 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4293, 1996 WL 194865
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 1996·No. No. 95-0745·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the petition with prejudice. See State v. Broom, 523 So.2d 639, 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (circuit court has no jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction in another circuit and to order a new trial therefore), appeal dismissed, 545 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1989); White v. Dugger, 511 So.2d 554, 555 (Fla.1987) (habeas petition is not a vehicle for obtaining review of issues which could have or should have been raised on direct appeal or in rule 3.850 proceedings).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huffman v. Singletary, 672 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4293, 1996 WL 194865 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
672 So. 2d 112 (Huffman v. Singletary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huffman v. State
43 So. 3d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)