Huffman v. Singletary

672 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4293, 1996 WL 194865
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 24, 1996
DocketNo. 95-0745
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 672 So. 2d 112 (Huffman v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huffman v. Singletary, 672 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4293, 1996 WL 194865 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the petition with prejudice. See State v. Broom, 523 So.2d 639, 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (circuit court has no jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction in another circuit and to order a new trial therefore), appeal dismissed, 545 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1989); White v. Dugger, 511 So.2d 554, 555 (Fla.1987) (habeas petition is not a vehicle for obtaining review of issues which could have or should have been raised on direct appeal or in rule 3.850 proceedings).

Affirmed.

GUNTHER, C.J., and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huffman v. State
43 So. 3d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
672 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4293, 1996 WL 194865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffman-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1996.