Huffman v. Singletary
This text of 672 So. 2d 112 (Huffman v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the petition with prejudice. See State v. Broom, 523 So.2d 639, 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (circuit court has no jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction in another circuit and to order a new trial therefore), appeal dismissed, 545 So.2d 1366 (Fla.1989); White v. Dugger, 511 So.2d 554, 555 (Fla.1987) (habeas petition is not a vehicle for obtaining review of issues which could have or should have been raised on direct appeal or in rule 3.850 proceedings).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
672 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4293, 1996 WL 194865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffman-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1996.