Huffman v. CITY OF MARLETTE
728 N.W.2d 435, 477 Mich. 1057, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 624
Opinion
Lovina HUFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF MARLETTE, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huffman v. CITY OF MARLETTE, 728 N.W.2d 435, 477 Mich. 1057, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 624 (Mich. 2007).
728 N.W.2d 435 (Huffman v. CITY OF MARLETTE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.