Huffman v. CITY OF MARLETTE
728 N.W.2d 435, 477 Mich. 1057, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 624
This text of 728 N.W.2d 435 (Huffman v. CITY OF MARLETTE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Huffman v. CITY OF MARLETTE, 728 N.W.2d 435, 477 Mich. 1057, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 624 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Lovina HUFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF MARLETTE, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
728 N.W.2d 435, 477 Mich. 1057, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffman-v-city-of-marlette-mich-2007.