Huffington v. Farrel
35 N.Y.S. 1109, 97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 887
This text of 35 N.Y.S. 1109 (Huffington v. Farrel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Huffington v. Farrel, 35 N.Y.S. 1109, 97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 887 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
The opinion of the court of appeals delivered on a former appeal (100 N. Y. 179, 2 N. E. 915) required the action taken by the trial judge, and commands an affirmance of the judgment on this review. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cunningham v. . Judson
2 N.E. 915 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 N.Y.S. 1109, 97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 610, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huffington-v-farrel-nysupct-1895.