Huff v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Huff v. State

1922 OK CR 97, 206 P. 1117, 21 Okla. Crim. 255, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 244

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 12, 1922

DocketNo. A-3930.

StatusPublished

This text of 1922 OK CR 97 (Huff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huff v. State, 1922 OK CR 97, 206 P. 1117, 21 Okla. Crim. 255, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 244 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, F. L. Huff, was tried and convicted, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in ;he penitentiary for two years, upon an information charging ;hat in Jackson county on the 23d day of March, 1920, he did shoot one Jesse Tipton with intent to kill. From the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was duly perfected, oy filing in this court on March 7, 1921, a petition in error with ease-made. Plaintiff in error by his counsel of record las filed' a motion to dismiss his appeal, with request that man *256 date issue forthwith. The motion to dismiss said appeal is sustained and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment and sentence to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, F. L. Huff, was tried and convicted, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in ;he penitentiary for two years, upon an information charging ;hat in Jackson county on the 23d day of March, 1920, he did shoot one Jesse Tipton with intent to kill. From the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was duly perfected, oy filing in this court on March 7, 1921, a petition in error with ease-made. Plaintiff in error by his counsel of record las filed' a motion to dismiss his appeal, with request that man *256 date issue forthwith. The motion to dismiss said appeal is sustained and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment and sentence to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1922 OK CR 97, 206 P. 1117, 21 Okla. Crim. 255, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huff-v-state-oklacrimapp-1922.