Huff v. State

27 A.D.2d 892, 278 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4635
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1967·No. Claim No. 45545·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Staley, Jr., J.

Appeal by the State of New York from the order of the Court of Claims which denied the State’s motion for reargument, and granted the claimant 30 days in which to file a claim for false arrest and imprisonment. The claimant was arrested on January 16, 1965, and was released on bail the following day, and was acquitted on July 12, 1965. He moved for permission to file a late claim for assault and battery and for false arrest on June 8, 1965. The motion was denied by order dated August 3, 1965 with prejudice as to the cause of action for assault and battery, and without prejudice as to the cause of action for false arrest, on the ground that the claim for false arrest did not accrue until July 12, 1965. ‘ On September 7, 1965, the motion was reargued, and the Court of Claims adhered to its original decision by order, dated November 6, 1965, and granted 30 days from the date of the order to file the claim. The State contends that the claim accrued on January 17, 1965 and not on July 12, 1965 as determined by the Court of Claims. In this contention, the State is correct. “A claim for false arrest accrues at the time of arraignment and release on bail.” (Bomboy v. State of New York, 26 A D 2d 974; Molyneaux v. County of Nassau, 22 A D 2d 954, affd. 16 N Y 2d 663.) Order denying without prejudice claimant’s motion for leave to file a late claim for damages for false arrest modified, on the law and the facts, so as to provide that such denial be with prejudice, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed as academic, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Staley, Jr., J. [47 Misc 2d 1053.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huff v. State, 27 A.D.2d 892, 278 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

27 A.D.2d 892 (Huff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. Home
377 F. Supp. 2d 361 (S.D. New York, 2005)
Sanchez v. County of Westchester
146 A.D.2d 620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Karen v. State
111 Misc. 2d 396 (New York State Court of Claims, 1981)
Dailey v. Smiley
65 A.D.2d 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Tunia v. State
106 Misc. 2d 601 (New York State Court of Claims, 1978)
Jastrzebski v. City of New York
423 F. Supp. 669 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Brady v. Penn Central Transportation Co.
406 F. Supp. 1239 (S.D. New York, 1975)
Dorak v. County of Nassau
329 F. Supp. 497 (E.D. New York, 1970)