Huff v. State

127 S.E. 303, 33 Ga. App. 591, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 617

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 27, 1925·No. 16077·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

No reversible error is shown by the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, and there was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur. Carlisle Coll, Lamar C. Bucher, for plaintiff in error. A. 8. Shelton, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huff v. State, 127 S.E. 303, 33 Ga. App. 591, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 617 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

127 S.E. 303 (Huff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.