Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Huff v. State

Huff v. State

127 S.E. 303, 33 Ga. App. 591, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 617
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 27, 1925
Docket16077
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 S.E. 303 (Huff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huff v. State, 127 S.E. 303, 33 Ga. App. 591, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 617 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Luke, J.

No reversible error is shown by the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, and there was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur. Carlisle Coll, Lamar C. Bucher, for plaintiff in error. A. 8. Shelton, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haynes v. Midland National Life Insurance
244 N.W. 110 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 S.E. 303, 33 Ga. App. 591, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huff-v-state-gactapp-1925.