Huff v. State
11 S.E. 619, 85 Ga. 336
Opinion
There was sufficient evidence to authorize the finding of the jury in this case. The 4th and 5th grounds of the motion for a new trial, which complain of error in admitting the testimony of Young and in admitting the alleged confession of defendant, do not state that the objection was made at the time, nor what the objection was; and therefore, under the repeated rulings of this court, we cannot consider these grounds.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Huff v. State, 11 S.E. 619, 85 Ga. 336 (Ga. 1890).
11 S.E. 619 (Huff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hawkes Co. v. Cowart Co.
94 S.E. 643 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
State v. Gay
56 S.E. 668 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1907)