Huff v. Mayor of Macon

43 S.E. 708, 117 Ga. 428, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 253
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 17, 1903·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pish, J.

Even conceding that-the municipal authorities of the City of Macon legally dedicated “ Central City Park” to the public, for the uses set forth in the petition, the judge was authorized to find, from the evidence, that the proposed use of the area within the mile track in the park, for agricultural purposes, as alleged in the petition, was not inconsistent with the uses for which such dedication was claimed to have been made. It follows that there-was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant the interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huff v. Mayor of Macon, 43 S.E. 708, 117 Ga. 428, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 253 (Ga. 1903).

43 S.E. 708 (Huff v. Mayor of Macon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lord v. City of Wilmington
332 A.2d 414 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1975)
Nichols v. City of Rock Island
121 N.E.2d 799 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1954)
Furlong v. South Park Commissioners.
151 N.E. 510 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1926)
Neil v. Kansas City
188 S.W. 919 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1916)