Huff v. Mayor of Macon
This text of 43 S.E. 708 (Huff v. Mayor of Macon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Even conceding that-the municipal authorities of the City of Macon legally dedicated “ Central City Park” to the public, for the uses set forth in the petition, the judge was authorized to find, from the evidence, that the proposed use of the area within the mile track in the park, for agricultural purposes, as alleged in the petition, was not inconsistent with the uses for which such dedication was claimed to have been made. It follows that there-was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant the interlocutory injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 S.E. 708, 117 Ga. 428, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huff-v-mayor-of-macon-ga-1903.