Huff v. Huff

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Huff v. Huff

157 S.E.2d 360, 271 N.C. 709, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1269

DecidedNovember 1, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.E.2d 360 (Huff v. Huff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huff v. Huff, 157 S.E.2d 360, 271 N.C. 709, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1269 (N.C. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence offered in behalf of Harold Huff and that offered in behalf of Myrtle Huff was in sharp and irreconcilable conflict. The questions of fact were for determination by the court. There was ample evidence to support the court’s findings of fact; and these findings provide ample support for the court’s pen-dente lite order. Hence, the order of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence offered in behalf of Harold Huff and that offered in behalf of Myrtle Huff was in sharp and irreconcilable conflict. The questions of fact were for determination by the court. There was ample evidence to support the court’s findings of fact; and these findings provide ample support for the court’s pen-dente lite order. Hence, the order of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.E.2d 360, 271 N.C. 709, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huff-v-huff-nc-1967.