Huff v. G. A. C. Finance Corp.

218 S.E.2d 170, 135 Ga. App. 500, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1715
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 16, 1975·No. 50818·Published

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

It was error for the trial court to deny defendant’s motion to set aside the default judgment in this case as the note attached to the complaint is identical to the note held void in Hardy v. G. A. C. Finance, 131 Ga. App. 282 (205 SE2d 526); aff'd 232 Ga. 632 (208 SE2d 453).

Judgment reversed.

Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huff v. G. A. C. Finance Corp., 218 S.E.2d 170, 135 Ga. App. 500, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1715 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

218 S.E.2d 170 (Huff v. G. A. C. Finance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

GAC FINANCE CORPORATION v. Hardy
208 S.E.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Hardy v. G. A. C. Finance Corp.
205 S.E.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)