Huff v. G. A. C. Finance Corp.

218 S.E.2d 170, 135 Ga. App. 500, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1715
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 16, 1975
Docket50818
StatusPublished

This text of 218 S.E.2d 170 (Huff v. G. A. C. Finance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huff v. G. A. C. Finance Corp., 218 S.E.2d 170, 135 Ga. App. 500, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1715 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

It was error for the trial court to deny defendant’s motion to set aside the default judgment in this case as the note attached to the complaint is identical to the note held void in Hardy v. G. A. C. Finance, 131 Ga. App. 282 (205 SE2d 526); aff'd 232 Ga. 632 (208 SE2d 453).

Judgment reversed.

Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GAC FINANCE CORPORATION v. Hardy
208 S.E.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Hardy v. G. A. C. Finance Corp.
205 S.E.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 S.E.2d 170, 135 Ga. App. 500, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huff-v-g-a-c-finance-corp-gactapp-1975.