Huff v. Bidwell

176 F. 1022, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4324
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Huff v. Bidwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 F. 374
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 12, 1910·No. No. 2,048·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The original decree, as affirmed in this court, required-all the property of the defendant Huff to be sold to pay off, adjust, and satisfy the many liens thereon,- and in the conduct and management of the sale complained of the trial judge had and exercised a sound discretion. As the case is presented by the r.ecbrd, we conclude that the sale in question was properly confirmed. The‘decree appealed from is affirmed, and, considering the large amount of funds tied up by the appeal, mandate, will issue at once.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huff v. Bidwell, 176 F. 1022, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4324 (5th Cir. 1910).

176 F. 1022 (Huff v. Bidwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.