Huff v. Attorney General of Virginia
This text of Huff v. Attorney General of Virginia (Huff v. Attorney General of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7886
JOHNNY R. HUFF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD CHAIRMAN; TIM KAINE, Gov.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:07-cv-00744-MHL)
Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny R. Huff, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Johnny R. Huff appeals the district court’s order
dismissing Huff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Huff v.
Attorney General, No. 3:07-cv-00744-MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 26,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Huff v. Attorney General of Virginia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huff-v-attorney-general-of-virginia-ca4-2009.