Huey v. State
722 So. 2d 286, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16472, 1998 WL 906942
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 31, 1998
DocketNo. 98-936
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 722 So. 2d 286 (Huey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Huey v. State, 722 So. 2d 286, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16472, 1998 WL 906942 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
There is no double jeopardy violation when a defendant is convicted of the crime of delivery of a controlled substance and possession with intent to sell the same substance, because each crime contains an element that the other does not. Sec. 775.021(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997); State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939 (Fla.1991). Cf. Paccione v. State, 698 So.2d 252 (Fla.1997).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dana David Johnson v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014
Johnson v. State
150 So. 3d 214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Cox v. State
737 So. 2d 655 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
722 So. 2d 286, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16472, 1998 WL 906942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huey-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.